droolay
dulay, gulay... ei, i'm vegetarian naman ah!!
i don't know about this man, there's just something in his eyes.. some kind of intensity, maybe?? oh well, allow me to let you meet a sideburned globetrotter JP and Jonas were making fun of:
dulay, gulay... ei, i'm vegetarian naman ah!!
Meet my heroine's mind:
If you held these concepts with total consistency, as the base of your convictions, you would have a full philosophical system to guide the course of your life. But to hold them with total consistency—to understand, to define, to prove and to apply them—requires volumes of thought. Which is why philosophy cannot be discussed while standing on one foot—nor while standing on two feet on both sides of every fence. This last is the predominant philosophical position today, particularly in the field of politics.
My philosophy, Objectivism, holds that:
-Reality exists as an objective absolute—facts are facts, independent of man's feelings, wishes, hopes or fears.
-Reason (the faculty which identifies and integrates the material provided by man's senses) is man's only means of perceiving reality, his only source of knowledge, his only guide to action, and his basic means of survival.
-Man—every man—is an end in himself, not the means to the ends of others. He must exist for his own sake, neither sacrificing himself to others nor sacrificing others to himself. The pursuit of his own rational self-interest and of his own happiness is the highest moral purpose of his life.
-The ideal political-economic system is laissez-faire capitalism. It is a system where men deal with one another, not as victims and executioners, nor as masters and slaves, but as traders, by free, voluntary exchange to mutual benefit. It is a system where no man may obtain any values from others by resorting to physical force, and no man may initiate the use of physical force against others. The government acts only as a policeman that protects man's rights; it uses physical force only in retaliation and only against those who initiate its use, such as criminals or foreign invaders. In a system of full capitalism, there should be (but, historically, has not yet been) a complete separation of state and economics, in the same way and for the same reasons as the separation of state and church.
Copyright ã 1962 by Times-Mirror Co.
i came into my haven today, with the fresh rants, from some highfalutin' owners of raspy vocal chords, to serve as a welcome as i walked into the room. they're arguing about music. (as if it's a valid topic for one!)
oh well. woke up to a lazy morning... chatted with mom and her friends over coffee and capri.. what can i do, that's just what it is.
oh well, what can i do when everyone's accusing me of bigamy?
the last prelim test paper has been answered... at last, exam's over. i have to get back to normal by next week, prepare myself for a way hectic schedule next week.
i know my last entry might be vague... allow me to be ragin' mad sometimes because of too much injustice
where does freedom of expression end and tyranny begin?
so, here's the scenario:
Everyday, one encounters people who have got so much to say and yet nothing to mean. what do they create??? NOISE!
Without the political brouhahas, the Philippines is still a dang rockin good place after all. Why?